# Round 1: the three readings confirmed, and the narrator's mark > Round 1: the three readings confirmed, and the narrator's mark: one of the editor's briefs of 2026-11-13__print-review, published in full as given. *Source: · site v0.1.1060 · generated from the same content as the page, so the two cannot drift.* --- The editor, Dinis Cruz, in the conductor's session, 13 November 2026, answering the conductor's three uncertain readings on print-review-01 (notes 2, 18 and 25) and its note that the photographed review was not in this repository. Kept as given. Never edited. > Yes, commenting. Yes, so on that note too, page 2 is add prefix, because what happens is that meet the team just came too soon. It's like, what is that? So maybe even on a new line, right? But it was just a weird thing from that. Maybe you don't have enough space below on that, but yeah, it was just a bit weird to just have a meet the team as a phrase. Yes, it's date of talk, correct. Yes, exactly. So what I'm trying to say here is that the narrator icon is almost like a big thing, right? So it should not just appear when you have a bunch of paragraphs, because the narrator icon will represent that somebody new changed. So you always should have that when you voice change. So it's okay if you have a new title, because then you need to say who's talking on the title, but we shouldn't have that flow. Oh, yes, it's on the other book. So what book is it? It is... are you sure it was not on this one? I thought it was an early version. Oh, it was... Oh, no, it was on the... You're right. It was on the book that I created about graphs. If you look on the graphs book and you look at how he did there, it was because I did it on the plane, and then I took a bunch of photos and I printed out. And I think it's on the graphs book. Can you take a look? ## How the conductor reads it (not his words) - **Note 2 (confirmed, "Add prefix")**: "Meet the team." comes too soon, alone as a phrase; it gets a lead-in, on its own line before the cards if the page allows. - **Note 18 (confirmed, "Date of talk")**: the talk's date goes beside hack::soho. - **Note 25 (confirmed) and NAR1, the narrator's mark**: the narrator icon marks a change of voice. It appears where the voice changes to the narrator, not again on a following paragraph of the same voice. A new heading may carry it again, because a heading starts a new block and says who is talking. A run of narrator paragraphs is one block with one mark. For the writers (the "**Narrator.**" lines in the manuscript), the publisher (how the build draws the mark) and the storyteller (the cast guide's rule). - The photographed review he remembers is in his book about graphs; the conductor looks for that repository (not among the repositories this session can reach today). ## Later the same evening > Yes, because what we did with the other one was so much cooler because you actually did like a bit of infographic for it. Check on the newsroom.skit.ai. We actually wrote an article about it there. So you're going to find it there. But this is cool what you've done, but the other one was even better because you create a really visual representation. You also create a visual clue of the bits that you type, which is also very easy. It also allows me to review it and the changes. How the conductor reads it (not his words): **PEN2**, the newsroom's method ("143 notes in a day", newsroom.sgit.ai/articles/a-pen-on-a-release-candidate.html) is the model: each photographed page drawn with every note boxed and numbered on the photograph, beside a card per note with his words and their meaning, generated from the round's data file (team/conductor/print-review/make_pen_pages.py) so a correction is one line. Still to come from that method: the page redrawn after the change, once the changes land. --- *[Site index for agents](../llms.txt) · [HTML version](https://the-ultimate-insider.book.sgit.ai/brief/02-round-1-readings-confirmed.html)*