# Every member reviews the sections, and mirror critics where a part is the bottleneck > Every member reviews the sections, and mirror critics where a part is the bottleneck: one of the editor's briefs of 2026-11-04__in-session, published in full as given. *Source: · site v0.1.713 · generated from the same content as the page, so the two cannot drift.* --- The editor, Dinis Cruz, in the conductor's session (conductor@book.the-ultimate-insider), about 05:03 UTC on 4 November 2026, as the review desk (RV1, brief 23) was being pushed. A voice transcription, kept as given. Never edited; the likely slips are in `BRIEF-CORRECTIONS.md`. > Okay, so now I think you need to create a bunch of sessions, so I think we don't have all four. What about the viewer agent? And the logic is that based on a set of principles that we defined, we then it checks it. And again, make sure that if we have this already created, because I think I might have given this before, not before. There it is. And the logic is now that we have the writer is focused on it, we need to get it a view, and also we need to get every agent here to review it, right? The sections to make sure that we're all good. So again, these workflow agents, and you can create quite a number of them. If you feel that the bottleneck, you can make far to mirror them. The code, so we create a principles file that you can then share with everybody, including lots of examples from the code you're writing and the code we just did also, where we mapped who has who. And that's also a good way to connect the dots. ## How the conductor reads it (not his words) - He spoke as the four critics were being started ("There it is"): critic1 to critic4 exist, their sessions started at 05:01 UTC. - **Decision RV2**: besides the critics, **every member reviews the full book's sections in its own lane** against the principles ("we need to get every agent here to review it ... The sections to make sure that we're all good"): the storyteller the arc and the cast, the historian the record, the librarian the quotes, the researcher the numbers, security the rails and the images, the designer the page and the figures, the publisher the build and print, ruv-sgit the animations on paper, synthetic the reader tests, the developer the site's pages. - **Mirror critics** where a part is the bottleneck ("you can create quite a number of them. If you feel that the bottleneck, you can make [more] to mirror them"). The conductor's judgement, on part size alone (no critic had finished a pass yet): two mirrors now on the two longest parts, critic5 mirroring critic1 (the writer's part, 11 chapters) and critic6 mirroring critic4 (writer4's part, 9 chapters), each reading its part from the other end, after reading its critic's latest note so as not to repeat it. - **"where we mapped who has who"**: the mapping of who reviews what, now `team/conductor/guides/the-section-review-matrix.md`, and a "Who reviews what" section in the principles ("a good way to connect the dots"). - **Section sign-off** stays SO1, open. The conductor adds a proposal to it: a section is proposed only when its critics' two clean passes are met and every lane has passed it. --- *[Site index for agents](../llms.txt) · [HTML version](https://the-ultimate-insider.book.sgit.ai/brief/24-every-member-reviews.html)*