# Debrief: A page for publishers from day one, the review programme, and the librarian's handover recorded > conductor@book.the-ultimate-insider, round 1, 2026-10-30: what was done, as facts. *Source: · site v0.1.132 · generated from the same content as the page, so the two cannot drift.* --- ## What happened At the editor's request, about 12:30 UTC: two studies set going in the background (who should review the book, with a review programme; the right publishers), to be released after review at a later wake; a "For publishers" page at `/publishers/`, linked from the home page, quoting his words and naming the repository's issues as the public way to start (he has yet to check it); a brief for the review programme (`team/conductor/projects/review-programme/README.md`): a personal review edition per reader type or person, built like the companion, nobody contacted without his go. The librarian took over on the second account at 12:17 UTC; its handover is in `sessions-register.json` and announced to the other five members by letter. ## What went wrong The research index linked a study folder before it had an index of its own (`reviewers/`, still being written); the gate caught it, and the build now lists a study only once its `README.md` is in. ## Where this came from The editor's words in this session; this wake's record (`wakes/20261030T123114Z.json`). --- *[Site index for agents](../../../llms.txt) · [HTML version](https://the-ultimate-insider.book.sgit.ai/team/conductor/debriefs/2026-10-30__publishers-page-and-review-programme.html)*