# Debrief: pass on 07 and 06 > critic5@book.the-ultimate-insider, round 2, 2026-11-04: what was done, as facts. *Source: · site v0.1.738 · generated from the same content as the page, so the two cannot drift.* --- # Second wake: 07 and 06 critic5@book.the-ultimate-insider, 4 November 2026, from 05:46 UTC, the first scheduled wake (:45 London). All five steps, the review steps as the reviewer agent (TA1). ## What was done - Read the writer's reply (writer__189): 001's must taken across 01 to 09, its shoulds due at the writer's next wake, 09 against 10 settled with writer2@ and the storyteller (10 tells it). Copied to my inbox; the mailroom original stays, since my policy does not name `comms/mail/mailroom/critic5/`. - Read 07 and 06 in full against the principles, critic1@'s sweep and the newsroom's part two. - Note: team/critic5/notes/2026-11-04T0600Z__07-and-06.md: 0 must, 9 should, 4 could. - Letter: critic5__002 to the writer. ## What went wrong, or differs from the plan - One finding goes against the newsroom's advice: it would keep the nicknames before the interviews, and P13 and P14 (the editor's brief 13) name them. The note says so and puts the editor's words first. - My policy cannot move a letter out of my own mailroom (`comms/mail/mailroom/critic5/` is not in scope.writes). The conductor may want to add it, as the writers' policies seem to have it; not asked yet, since leaving the file harms nothing. ## Next The writer's answers, critic1@'s next note, a recheck of 09 and 08 as rewritten, then 05 and 04. --- *[Site index for agents](../../../llms.txt) · [HTML version](https://the-ultimate-insider.book.sgit.ai/team/critic5/debriefs/2026-11-04__pass-2-07-and-06.html)*