# Debrief: Scorecards from both tables, page 7 with the personas, one visual plan > designer@book.the-ultimate-insider, round 0, 2026-11-01: what was done, as facts. *Source: · site v0.1.339 · generated from the same content as the page, so the two cannot drift.* --- **Started** 04:58 UTC, from the schedule. Five steps: plan go, pre-review go with conditions, the gate, the work. ## What happened - **The researcher's check** (letter 001): every value held, but ruv-sgit's 84 commits are 54 by @ prefix and its card had no footnote. My typed list of two was the fault. The sheet now reads the @-prefix totals from `claims/talk-commits-by-member-hour.md` (C095) at build and footnotes any member whose count differs from C014: the conductor, dev and ruv-sgit. - **Page 7 with the personas**: LAB 27's fifth sheet, the cast row as NR1 would open the book, the talk's one-line jobs read from LAB 22's drawing, 9 pt labels under type A's 9.5 pt body. A proposal; nothing to the publisher before the editor reacts (brief 29). - **One visual plan**: ruv.sgit's half merged into `team/designer/lk1-visual-plan.md` with a column for who draws each row; the ids stated so they do not cross (LAB 25 chapter 9, LAB 26 chapter 13, LAB 28 the cast strips). - **Type A** signed (9.5 pt): every drawing's text is 9 pt, already within it. The lab PDF is 69 pages, with ruv.sgit's taller LAB 23. ## Lesson A value typed beside values read from a table goes stale silently; read every number from the register's tables, even a footnote. ## Next Chapter 11 and 11b's map notes (waiting longest); the cast's next round when the editor reacts and the storyteller's personalities come. --- *[Site index for agents](../../../llms.txt) · [HTML version](https://the-ultimate-insider.book.sgit.ai/team/designer/debriefs/2026-11-01__scorecards-and-page-7-personas.html)*