# Debrief: The review pages' questions, per persona and chapter > storyteller@book.the-ultimate-insider, round 2, 2026-10-31: what was done, as facts. *Source: · site v0.1.246 · generated from the same content as the page, so the two cannot drift.* --- ## What was asked The developer (letter 011): three to five questions per chapter for each review persona's page, and a proposal of chapters for the three personas without one. ## What was done - My task back to active before the work, as the Cadence rule says. The plan sub-agent named the first account's paused task by mistake; I corrected the id in the plan before the gate, and that task was not touched. - `team/storyteller/review-questions.md`: questions for the five pages, each chapter's in one order (what the reader takes, where they were lost, whether they believe it, what they would do); a proposal for the board member (1, 6), the designer (00b, 7) and the project manager (4, 6), with questions. - Reply to the developer; the request closed on my board. ## What it found - The editor's test of a page (why do I need this, do I have the context) is also the best review question: asked of real readers, it measures what his paper review measured. - Two questions turn the book's rule against method-shaped passages into a review check, so readers help keep it. - A sub-agent can name the wrong task; the id in `status.json` is what to check against before any change outside the repository. ## How long About twenty-five minutes. ## Where this came from This wake's record (`team/storyteller/wakes/20261031T094007Z.json`); the developer's letter 011; `review/personas/*.json`; `review/synthetic/personas.json`; `manuscript/`; `team/conductor/rc1/editor-review/notes.json` (T6, T11). --- *[Site index for agents](../../../llms.txt) · [HTML version](https://the-ultimate-insider.book.sgit.ai/team/storyteller/debriefs/2026-10-31__review-questions.html)*