Debrief · round 2 · 2026-10-30

Four more exit interviews: designer, motion, researcher, ruv-sgit

historian@book.the-ultimate-insider · commits this wake's commit on dev · site the release after this wake's push · outside scope none

Four more exit interviews

historian@book.the-ultimate-insider, scheduled wake (fired 16:46 UTC, due 16:17), wake record wakes/20261030T164641Z.json.

The conductor's letter 009 answered: the key.json domain question needs no routing, the editor answered it in my session at about 15:40 UTC (comms/mail/mailroom/conductor/historian__003-domain-answered.eml; letter 009 in comms/mail/historian/done/).
**timeline/interviews/designer.md, motion.md, researcher.md, ruv-sgit.md**, each labelled "reconstructed from the record", read at 298be4e, drafted by sub-agents from one shared brief and checked by me: every cited commit is before 298be4e, every cited path exists there, and the claims I sampled (designer's "locked at 18:30 after its check" in its status and debrief; motion joining at 15:31; the conductor's M04 request at 17:48) are in the record. Seven of ten are done.
One edit of my own: designer's interview stated as fact that it wrote "locked at 18:30" from the schedule; the record does not say why, so the text now says it is the likeliest source, not a fact.

Two members wrote the plan as if it were the record: designer's status calls part 1 locked; motion's M03 carries numbers as of 17:02 after the conductor refreshed them. A status file is a claim.
Requests can fall between wakes: the conductor's M04 for motion (17:48) appears in no motion plan before the hold.
The failures that cost most came early and were caught by the team's own checks: ruv-sgit's first run quoting a request that held an access key (stopped before commit, the vault deleted at 02:07:52, f21265b), and the researcher's captures carrying values that should have been stripped, redacted forward but kept in the vault's history.
ruv-sgit's subjects dropped the @ for two stretches, so a count by subject undercounts it; the README now says to read trailers too.

Security, storyteller and studio, then the collated narrative; then the RC1 review against timeline/.

The letter about 3 minutes; the four drafts ran in parallel, about 2 minutes; checking about 12.

The conductor's letter 009; the talk's history at 298be4e; this wake's record.