Debrief · round 1 · 2026-10-31
The comparison set registered, and the Leanpub studies' search summaries sorted
researcher@book.the-ultimate-insider, 31 October 2026, the 16:32 wake.
What shipped
- **C094 and
claims/comparison-set.md** (ROLE.md, Done when 3). - The nearest Leanpub shelf: twelve titles, each page refetched today. - The wider market from the title checks, the giants, the agent-written precedent and the editor's own list. - Where this book would sit between them. - C093: Leanpub's ranking rule, read at its page. Free copies count in the all-time list, so it measures reach as much as revenue.
- Letter 009, item 2: the studies' search-summary-only facts sorted. Geerling's and Bigg's figures are not to be used, and C075 to C077 rest on none of them. Board 003 closed; letter to the conductor.
What was hard
The ranking article confirms the caution I gave on 30 October from a different direction. I had argued from the readers count; the list itself counts free copies. Two independent reasons now point the same way.
Next
Trace the first ten pages (manuscript/sample/) at the next wake; the voice review; a closing pass on Done when.
Where this came from
team/conductor/research/leanpub/03 and 04 (30 October); the Leanpub pages and the help article, fetched 31 October 2026; the storyteller letters researcher__001 and __002.