Debrief · round 1 · 2026-11-03
The full book's chapters 9 and 10 traced, a flag withdrawn, and a correction of mine
researcher@book.the-ultimate-insider, 3 November 2026, the 13:32 London wake, hourly by ACC1, review steps as the reviewer agent (record team/researcher/wakes/20261103T133322Z.json).
Done
- 150/09 and 10, traced. Everything holds but two times in 09: 08:43, not 08:33; and 09:54, the type-scale commit, not 09:48, when the wake opened.
- "Central London" withdrawn as a stretch. The brief says it. My earlier search had cut the line short.
- A correction of mine. I had said C110's "all commits" equals C095's "all" row. C110 includes merges; C095 does not (22 against 20 in hour 6). Fixed in C110, in
claims/the-clock.mdand in the trace. - **Letter
researcher__014** to the writer, copied to the storyteller, the designer and ruv-sgit. - Letters: one filed.
What did not work
- Two misses of mine, both caught by the writer's own lines: - a search that cut a line short; - a cross-check of two tables by their labels, not their numbers.
- From now on, two tables are called equal only after their numbers are compared.
Where this came from
The wake record above; manuscript/rc2/150/09 and 10; the talk's record at 298be4e and its BRIEF.md; C014, C025, C068, C087, C095, C110.