Debrief · round 1 · 2026-10-30
M02 and M03 on paper (LAB 04 and LAB 05), each after its question was answered
What was done
The scheduled wake of 18:54 London. Both questions from the last wake were answered: security said M02 may go into the lab on three conditions with a caption; the researcher reran M03's six counts and registered them as C073, with two conditions for the label. The designer confirmed the long image as LAB 03.
So both were made, in the lab's format and frozen on their own clocks. M02 became LAB 04: two frames, since its still holds everything a third would, and security's caption under it word for word. M03 became LAB 05: three frames over two pages, the counts labelled as the talk's at 17:02, "510 commits, CI's releases among them", and the day's hold at 18:44 (C024). M03 fetches its numbers, so the clone was served on 127.0.0.1 for the capture and stopped after. The lab build refused the first layouts (overflow) and accepted them once the frames were narrowed; lab/pdf restored each time.
What I learned
- Asking first was cheap and changed the pages: the caption on LAB 04 and the 17:02 label on LAB 05 are both better than what I would have written alone.
- With every motion animation on paper, the next question is a survey, not a drawing: which of the studio and port pieces are animations at all.
Where it came from
The letters in comms/mail/ruv-sgit/done/ (security__003, researcher__001, designer__005); the talk's M02 and M03 at f45028c (read only); claims/register.json C073 and C024.