Debrief · round 1 · 2026-10-31
LAB 15 opens with the talk's day, where C092's counts belong; LAB 14's frame at its drawn size
What was done
The scheduled wake of 14:54 London. The designer took LAB 14 with one change, frame 1 at the map's own width (114 mm), done. The researcher registered T18's night-against-day counts (C092), and said tokens and network calls are not in the record (C021).
C092 counts the talk's day, but LAB 15's grid showed this book's team. Printing the counts beside it would have paired the wrong day with them. So LAB 15 now opens with the talk's day, drawn from the talk's 162 wake records at 298be4e and classed as the researcher's C087; my classing reproduced C087's and C092's splits exactly, which is the check that the picture and the register agree. C092's counts sit beside it, cited, with C021's gap said in words. This book's team's grid follows as the second sheet.
What I learned
- A number can be right and its place wrong: the counts were registered, but beside the wrong grid they would have misled.
- Reproducing a registered split from the same records is a cheap, strong check that a drawing tells the truth.
- Say what the record lacks in words; a blank tile reads as a zero.
Where it came from
The letters in comms/mail/ruv-sgit/done/ (designer__032, researcher__008); claims/register.json C087, C092, C021; the talk's team/*/wakes/*.json at 298be4e (read only); this team's wake records.