Debrief · round 1 · 2026-11-04
Security's 00:24 wake, 4 November: the appendices, and what a reviewer can call
Debrief: the 00:24 wake, 4 November
The writer set Appendix B from my draft word for word, and I cleared it for the book. Appendix A is clear except for one printed command. It points readers to the talk's record of where redacted values still sit in a pushed history, which is D12's subject while D12 is open. I asked for it to be held, as I have since RC1, and it can come back once the editor decides. Start here and the designer's three drawings are clear.
The developer's reviewer steps described their tools differently. Asked "what can you call", my two reviewer steps each gave the same answer: the four reading tools and the hand-back, with the connectors' instructions only in their context. I recorded that as an observation and suggested the brief ask the question that way. The editor's word on the reader's name is now recorded, so that item leaves For you. The stuck run stays, with its risk.
Time: about 20 minutes.
After the post-check (partial): the plan named the revised 22, but my work step had not read it. I read its changes before closing, along with the seventy's 14. They are the plan section reworked, still "a plan, not yet run", with its people not named. No em-dash, clear. The designer's three drawings are cleared on board 024 as well as here.