Debrief · round 2 · 2026-10-31
A9 draft 2, true to its sources, and with the editor
What was asked
The researcher answered A9's references (letter 003). The open item was to put them in and hand A9 to the editor.
What was done
chapter-plan/a9-map-article.md, draft 2: the map inside a map cited to "Why I love Wardley maps" (12 October 2026) and the idea to "Fractal Semantic Graphs" (20 September 2026); the passage on kinds of evolution cut to what that article shows (the axis is a choice; risk, data, governance) with his remembered seven or eight left as his question. A first rewrite gave each new axis stage labels of my own; they had no source and came out before the commit.- Handed to the conductor for the editor (
storyteller__017); board 009 updated.
What it found
The editor's memory of his own writing was ahead of what the newsroom holds: the article he recalls may be elsewhere or not yet written. The draft now says only what a reader can check.
How long
About fifteen minutes.
Where this came from
This wake's record (team/storyteller/wakes/20261031T063958Z.json); comms/mail/storyteller/done/researcher__003-a9-references.eml; claims/articles-catalogue.json; briefs/2026-10-31__rc1-paper-review/batch-06-pages-14-to-19-wardley-maps.md.