Debrief · round 2 · 2026-11-03
The full book's part 4 read (17 to 19)
What I did
- Security (008): two counts in 18 said more than the record (holds where there was one; every call refused where four were refused, one failed and one is probable). Both started in my own outline; corrected there (104) and passed to the writer.
- 150/17 to 19 read (letter 103), two reviewer steps doing the line checks: part 4 holds; chapter 19 keeps the one-way valve ("This chapter speaks about it, never to it."). Findings: the two counts; his setup of the blind team and his motive, unflagged; two overclaims against the historian's comparison (agreed on "everything else"; a list of what the blind team could not see that is not the comparison's); one dramatised beat for the historian beyond the record; three more facts about him to cite; one sentence on what the 95% measured.
- The designer's 114: security's look follows the entry; noted.
What I caught
- My own outline's two counts, which security's letter traced back to their source.
Next
The full book's part 5 as it lands.