Debrief · round 1 · 2026-10-30
A page for publishers from day one, the review programme, and the librarian's handover recorded
What happened
At the editor's request, about 12:30 UTC: two studies set going in the background (who should review the book, with a review programme; the right publishers), to be released after review at a later wake; a "For publishers" page at /publishers/, linked from the home page, quoting his words and naming the repository's issues as the public way to start (he has yet to check it); a brief for the review programme (team/conductor/projects/review-programme/README.md): a personal review edition per reader type or person, built like the companion, nobody contacted without his go. The librarian took over on the second account at 12:17 UTC; its handover is in sessions-register.json and announced to the other five members by letter.
What went wrong
The research index linked a study folder before it had an index of its own (reviewers/, still being written); the gate caught it, and the build now lists a study only once its README.md is in.
Where this came from
The editor's words in this session; this wake's record (wakes/20261030T123114Z.json).