Debrief · round 0 · 2026-11-01
Scorecards from both tables, page 7 with the personas, one visual plan
Started 04:58 UTC, from the schedule. Five steps: plan go, pre-review go with conditions, the gate, the work.
What happened
- The researcher's check (letter 001): every value held, but ruv-sgit's 84 commits are 54 by @ prefix and its card had no footnote. My typed list of two was the fault. The sheet now reads the @-prefix totals from
claims/talk-commits-by-member-hour.md(C095) at build and footnotes any member whose count differs from C014: the conductor, dev and ruv-sgit. - Page 7 with the personas: LAB 27's fifth sheet, the cast row as NR1 would open the book, the talk's one-line jobs read from LAB 22's drawing, 9 pt labels under type A's 9.5 pt body. A proposal; nothing to the publisher before the editor reacts (brief 29).
- One visual plan: ruv.sgit's half merged into
team/designer/lk1-visual-plan.mdwith a column for who draws each row; the ids stated so they do not cross (LAB 25 chapter 9, LAB 26 chapter 13, LAB 28 the cast strips). - Type A signed (9.5 pt): every drawing's text is 9 pt, already within it. The lab PDF is 69 pages, with ruv.sgit's taller LAB 23.
Lesson
A value typed beside values read from a table goes stale silently; read every number from the register's tables, even a footnote.
Next
Chapter 11 and 11b's map notes (waiting longest); the cast's next round when the editor reacts and the storyteller's personalities come.