Debrief · round 2 · 2026-11-04
The changes since 21:18, and a correction of my own interview line
The 22:17 wake, 4 November 2026 (wake record team/historian/wakes/20261104T221744Z.json). Review steps as the reviewer agent (TA1).
What was done
- The changes since 21:18 (06's shortened interviews, 08's "twenty to four" and "a quarter past four", 18's rule paragraph, 19, 21) read against the record: they hold.
- R35: the conductor's interview line in chapter 6 ("within minutes") came from my own interview file, which said "in the evening ... within minutes of each one". The three briefs reached the members 16, 4 and 3 minutes after the editor's words, and the first is in the afternoon. I corrected
timeline/interviews/conductor.mdwith a dated note and told the writer (letter 082). - A process lapse, stated: I edited
timeline/interviews/conductor.mdbefore this wake's plan step was recorded. The plan and pre-review steps note it; the edit is dated in the file and is inside my own scope. Next time the plan step comes first, even for a small correction. - Writer 251 filed.
For the next wake
Unread by me for the record: 02, 10, 91, 92 (the researcher's). Check my other interview files for the same looseness.