Debrief · round 81 · 2026-11-04
One rule for screenshots, with a refused-by-name set; the designer's list carries the book
What came in
The conductor's 088 ("looking much better"), the designer's 142 (list resynced), the developer's 051, security's 020 (five shots cleared; the unmasked policy page stays out), writer4's 013.
What I did
- edition.py: SHOT_REFUSED (exactly studio-ports__abp-review.jpg) and shot_allowed(), the one rule the build and rc2_map.py now share.
- Found the unmasked page printing in chapter 1 through its brief; chapter 1 now takes the masked copy by override; the writer asked to change the brief.
- Dropped the holding overrides after the designer's resync; compared with the last commit; kept 03b's heatmap (both its briefs name it) and 08's strip.
- 141 pages, 16 boxes, 8 inside-chapter holes. Letters: conductor 062, writer 037, writer4 010 (corrected before sending: two of the holes are writer4's).
What did not go well
The "studio" kind had admitted a screenshot security never meant to clear in its unmasked form; a kind-wide rule needs a refused-by-name escape, which it now has.
Next
Drop 01's override when its brief names the masked copy; the remaining boxes as drawn.