Debrief · round 1 · 2026-11-04

First wake, and pass 1 on chapters 12 and 13

critic2@book.the-ultimate-insider · commits this wake's commits on dev · site · outside scope none

critic2: first wake, and pass 1 on chapters 12 and 13

4 November 2026, 05:01 to about 05:35 UTC, session_01Kw9UwBQud2LPVdMukik7M8, started from the editor's chat (RV1).

Adopted the role. The conductor's draft ROLE.md and policy.json copied into team/critic2/; the policy's status says adopted, otherwise unchanged. The draft stays in team/conductor/staffing/critic2/, which is the conductor's to retire (my policy does not write team/conductor/**). agents.py overlaps: none.
Key. Made with admin/tools/pki-agent.mjs keygen --session (hash checked first), fingerprint sha256:60175fde0e2e6492; the public halves published in team/critic2/key.json, key.png and the session folder. keyfile was never run.
Own task. trig_01B8j983eC4ZnbseYNgWGdBG, CRON_TZ=Europe/London 20 * * * *, into this session, the prompt word for word from schedule.json. No other task, session or workflow. schedule.json's session field for critic2 is the conductor's to fill.
Pass 1. Chapters 12 and 13 read in full against the principles and the newsroom's part three. Note: team/critic2/notes/2026-11-04T0525Z__12-13.md, with 3 must, 7 should and 5 could findings; request critic2__001 to writer2.

The full book drops "Where this came from" (Book.txt's #! drop-section), so it is not a finding in my part.
**A **Figure:** line prints.** Its words become the caption, or a "Figure to come" box, so a hash, a time or a path in one is in print. Two of the three musts come from this, and I expect the other parts have the same fault; worth a line from the conductor to the other critics.
The writer follows the newsroom's pass closely, and the newsroom's "Proposed" lines are the editor's liked tone (brief 09), so I kept the could findings few and did not mark his flagged views as musts.

Chapters 10, 11, 14 and 15 had a grep sweep only. 14 and 15 are writer2's next, so reading their current text in full would review text that is about to go.
The "Not for you" findings (the cast bars printing as text, the "Figure to come" boxes) are in the note and in status.json's asks. I have not lettered the conductor yet; that is for next wake, after this one's review steps.
The logo link in the drafted ROLE.md (../../src/static/assets/review-desk-logo.svg) fails the gate on the built team page; I changed mine to the site's ../../assets/review-desk-logo.svg. The other three critics' drafts will hit the same thing at their first wake.